Safeguards
When the law changes in Britain it is essential that there are sufficient legal safeguards to protect vulnerable people, as is the case in Oregon (USA). By providing safeguarded choice, the new law will ensure that vulnerable people are better protected than under the present status quo.
Dignity in Dying believes that the debate on assisted dying is not about whether we should change the law, as this is beyond doubt, but rather what safeguards should be contained in a new Bill.
The last attempt to change the law was in 2006. Sadly, Lord Joffe's Assisted Dying for the Terminally ill (ADTI) Bill was defeated in the House of Lords. Lord Joffe's Bill built on the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, which has worked successfully for over 10 years. Through a combination of qualifying conditions and safeguards Dignity in Dying firmly believes that the ADTI Bill would have provided greater choice for terminally ill adults whilst fully protecting vulnerable people.
The ADTI Bill allowed for assisted dying, but not voluntary euthanasia. This means doctors at the request of a terminally ill adult could prescribe life-ending medication, but they would not be able to administer it directly. Patients would have to take the medication themselves.
In order to receive medical help to die under the ADTI Bill, a person would have to:
* be terminally ill with six months or less to live &
* be mentally competent &
* make persistent, well-informed, voluntary requests &
* be suffering unbearably
Those who would not be eligible for medical help to die under the ADTI Bill are:
* People with disabilities who are not terminally ill
* Elderly people who are not terminally ill
* People with non-terminal illnesses
* People who are not mentally competent, including those with dementia or Alzheimer's
* People who are under 18
Some of the key safeguards contained in the ADTI Bill are:
* Assessments by two independent doctors to establish whether the request is well-informed, persistent & voluntary
* A consultation with a palliative care expert to explore alternatives
* Referral to a consultant psychiatrist or a clinical psychologist if mental competency is in doubt
* The patient would need to make two oral & one written request for assistance in dying, to be verified by two independent witnesses. Witnesses could not be family members
* A waiting period of at least 14 days for the patient to reflect on their decision
* Patients could orally revoke the request at any point

























