
on assisted suicide
On Thursday 25th February the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) issued the final version of his prosecuting policy on cases of 'Encouraging or Assisting Suicide'.
What does the policy mean?
The revised guidelines make clear that there is a distinction between compassionate acts to assist someone to end their own life which, subject to other factors, are unlikely to be prosecuted, and malicious encouragement or assistance of suicide which will be prosecuted.
This marks a significant step forward for the campaign. Our Chief Executive, Sarah Wootton, hailed the guidelines as a "victory for common sense and compassion".
However, whilst the guidelines give individuals much clearer indications of how they are likely to be treated under the law, they do not change the law, or provide immunity from prosecution. Assisting suicide is still a crime, and cases of 'mercy killing' where a person directly end the life of another person at their request will still be prosecuted as murder or manslaughter.
What does the policy say and how has it changed?
The final version of the prosecuting policy has changed from the interim version, but in the words of the DPP "the Policy has neither been relaxed nor tightened".
A prosecution is less likely if the assisted person made a voluntary, well informed decision to commit suicide, and if the assister was wholly motivated by compassion and if they had sought to dissuade the person from committing suicide.
A prosecution is more likely if the person committing suicide was under 18, if they did not have mental capacity or had not made a voluntary decision. A prosecution is also more likely if the assister has a history of violence or abuse towards the assisted person, if they assisted or encouraged several people's suicide, or are paid for their assistance.
The factors relating to the health and disability and to the relationship of the suspect to the person assisted (that the suspect was the partner, a relative or close friend) have been removed. However, prosecutions are more likely if the assisted person was physically able to undertake the act that constituted assistance and if the assister assisted or encouraged someone they did not know to commit suicide. This effectively recognises that assistance is more likely to be compassionately motivated when a person needs help to commit suicide, and when the assister knows the person they assist.
In another change, the policy instructs police and prosecutors to adopt a 'common sense' approach to the issue of financial gain. If it is shown that compassion was the only driving force behind the assister's actions, the fact that they may have 'gained' some benefit will not usually be treated as a factor in favour of prosecution.
Where does the policy apply?
The policy covers actions to assist suicide carried out in England and Wales, but the suicide could take place in England and Wales or in any other country.
What about Scotland and Northern Ireland?
The law in Northern Ireland on assisted suicide is the same as the law in England and Wales. The Director of Public Prosecutions in Northern Ireland has also launched the same policy for consultation in Northern Ireland. You can find out more about the consultation in Northern Ireland here: http://www.ppsni.gov.uk/default.aspx?CATID=139&CID=143.
The Scottish equivalent of the DPP, Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC, has said that similar guidance will not be issued in Scotland. There is no specific crime of 'assisted suicide' in Scotland, but people there who assist suicide may be liable for prosecution for the crime of culpable homicide.
What next?
The guidelines mark a significant step forward for the campaign. Whilst public policy now recognises that assistance from compassionate motives is acceptable in certain circumstances, it does not provide a safe means of assisted dying with checks and balances against abuse or coercion before someone has died rather than after. A change in the law to allow assisted dying subject to strict legal safeguards would give dying people real choice, and offer much greater protection to vulnerable people than the current law.
The reaction to the guidelines was broadly positive. It is significant that the guidelines were welcomed by groups opposing a change in the law, such as Care not Killing. This means that any attempts to reverse the guidelines in the future are almost certain to fail.
Dignity in Dying is committed to achieving a change in the law - as Sarah told the press: "Assisted dying legislation is something that society wants, that common sense demands - and those patients, families and loved ones facing tough choices deserve."
We'd like to thank all members and supporters who took the time to respond to the DPP's consultation on the interim version of the prosecuting policy - making your voice heard has played a crucial part in securing this important breakthrough for our campaign.

























