News / Press Releases
12 Nov 2010: Frances Inglis loses appeal but given a reduced sentence
Dignity in Dying comments on 'mixed result' for mother who acted out of compassion, and calls on Parliament to address this ongoing problem
The Court of Appeal today handed down
judgment on the appeal of Frances Inglis, a mother who gave her brain-damaged
son a lethal heroin injection in order to end his life. The appeal against her
conviction was refused but her minimum sentence was reduced from nine years to
five.
Mrs Inglis was found guilty of murder and
attempted murder on 21st January 2010. Her son Tom sustained severe
brain damage as a result of an
Sarah Wootton, Chief Executive of Dignity in Dying said:
"Whilst we do not condone Mrs Inglis' actions, given that she
directly ended her son's life without his consent, it is clear that her motives
were selfless, and we do not think that her actions should be unduly punished
because murder law is not equipped for compassion. We are therefore heartened
by the news that her sentence has been reduced. The previous sentence of nine years in prison was disproportionate to
the crime she committed out of compassion and love for her son. It should be
taken into account that alongside losing her son, Mrs Inglis has already served
nearly two years in prison and is extremely unlikely to reoffend.
"Lord Judge recognised that his judgment was constrained by the law of murder as it stands, a law which doesn't distinguish between behaviour motivated by malice and behaviour motivated by "familial love?. Dignity in Dying is not calling for the legalisation of 'mercy killing', but we are calling for more distinction to be made in the law between assisted dying, assisted suicide, euthanasia and murder. But this is ultimately a matter for Parliament not the Courts.
"Dignity in Dying would like to see a law which allows the choice
of assisted dying for people who are terminally ill and mentally competent. We
believe that ending the life of a non- terminally ill disabled person,
regardless of the severity of their disability, is cause for prosecution. But for
cases which fall outside the framework of assisted dying which we advocate, the
law should be able to react with compassion and flexibility so that sentencing
can reflect the motivation for the crime, and any extenuating circumstances."
Lord Judge stated in his judgment:
"How the problems of mercy killing, euthanasia and assisting
suicide should be addressed must be decided by Parliament, which, for this
purpose at any rate, should be reflective of the conscience of the nation."
At present the law only makes two
distinctions in cases of helping another person to die; assisting a suicide or
murder, whereas in reality cases of compassionate assistance to die covers a
broad spectrum of ethically different
Notes to editor:
About Dignity in Dying:
· Dignity
in Dying campaigns for greater choice, control and
· Dignity
in Dying has over 25,000 supporters and receives its funding entirely from
donations from the public.
· The
British Social Attitudes Survey 2010 found that 92% of non-religious and 71% of
religious people support assisted dying. This relates to overall support of 82%.
Dignity
in Dying campaigns for the legalisation and regulation of assisted dying - not
assisted suicide, euthanasia or 'mercy killing':
Compassion in Dying
An Advance Decision is a document that allows you to set out the
treatment decisions you would want to make in advance should you become unable
to communicate with your health team. The refusal of medical treatment,
including life-sustaining treatment, is legally binding with an Advance
Decision.
Compassion in Dying provides Advance
Decisions to legally refuse treatment at the end of life free of charge at: www.compassionindying.org.uk
Media
Cont
For all media enquiries, please cont



















