The RCP is still behind the public on this issue, but they are catching up.
The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) have re-affirmed their opposition to assisted dying today after a recent survey of fellows and members.
The survey found that 42.5% of physicians supported some form of assisted dying, while 57.5% were opposed. The survey also asked about the position that the College should currently take on assisted dying; 44.4% wanted to maintain its current opposition, 24.6% wanted the college to be in favour and 31% wanted neutrality.
Sir Graeme Catto, Chair of Dignity in Dying, former President of the GMC and fellow of the RCP, said:
“I commend the RCP for undertaking this survey, but it is perplexing that they draw the conclusion from its results that they should remain opposed to change. Only a minority of those surveyed supported a position of continued opposition by the College, with a combined majority in favour of a position of support or neutrality. It would be helpful in light of this if the RCP clarified its continued opposition to change.
“Nevertheless, for the majority of the public who support change, there is a lot of encouragement to be taken from this survey. First, the RCP has acknowledged that opinion amongst its members to a change in the law is shifting, with 42.5% now supporting some form of a change in the law. This is a dramatic swing from its last survey in 2006. Secondly, a fifth of its members indicated a willingness to assist a terminally ill patient to die, within safeguards and if the law were to change. This would be more than enough doctors to make a law work safely for the relatively small, but significant, number of dying patients who wish to control the time and manner of their death.
“The RCP is still behind the public on this issue, but they are catching up. An overwhelming majority of the British public support assisted dying for terminally ill, mentally competent people. After a final warning from the Supreme Court, Parliament has begun constructively working towards a safe law with Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying Bill which allows patients to have choice and control over their own death. Currently people are already taking drastic decisions to have this control, whether by travelling abroad or taking their own life alone.
“The survey shows there are a range of opinions on assisted dying and this should be reflected in a stance of neutrality. It should be noted that the Assisted Dying Bill includes a conscientious objection clause for any doctors who would not want to be involved in the process.
“It is telling that the group most affected by the current law, that of patients, were not involved in the RCP’s survey. This is in stark contrast to the Canadian Medical Association who decided to re-evaluate their stance after directly engaging with patients and hearing what they wanted for their own end of life care.”